Fascism: Making the political corporate

Mussolini said that fascism was the merger of state and corporate power. But this isn’t totally accurate. What fascism really is is the imposition of the corporate onto the state.

Corporations, as Noam Chomsky pointed out before he became a shitlib, are perfect models of tyranny — perfect totalitarian institutions. In them, power flows top-down and responsibility flows bottom-up. When the C-suite executives screw up, it’s the janitor who loses his job.

Chris Hedges says that, under fascism, truth and lies become the same thing. He and others can notice this happening in the political sphere. But it’s always been this way in any workplace. Hedges, whom I love, never has noticed this because he’s never been a corporate drone. He’s always been more privileged than that.

In fact, everyone you’ve ever heard of on the left has never been a corporate drone. They’ve all been more privileged than that, and if they were once drones, if they’re now mucky-mucks on the left, then they’re people whose drone days are long behind them.

This includes everyone on the left, even people that I love, respect, and think do great work. None of them have day jobs. They all own and run their own businesses. That doesn’t mean they’re raking in the dough. In most cases, they’re probably making less money than I am, and I am in fact a corporate drone.

But when you’re not a corporate drone, you can’t see the ongoing propaganda internal to all workplaces that all workers are subjected to on a daily basis, because you’re not there to experience it yourself.

I’ll give you one example. In a job I once had, one of the employees was fired. At a meeting a few weeks or months later, his name was brought up by a manager for some unrelated reason. The manager described him as the employee who left. She didn’t say, “He was fired.” She said, “He left.”

Well, this is technically accurate. But it’s also a lie. He didn’t leave. He was shown the door. But this level of honesty can’t be permitted in any authoritarian institution. Incidentally, this manager was not being intentionally obfuscatory. In her mind, that employee really had left. In her mind, she wasn’t hiding anything. She was completely calm and rational when she said, “He left.” The actual truth of what happened wasn’t actually in her mind.1

As U.S. power declines and the U.S. ruling class seeks to maintain control, they naturally turn to more authoritarian measures. They naturally seek to make the political sphere operate more like the economic sphere — that is, they naturally seek to impose corporate authoritarianism on the larger society.

To a wage slave, though, not much changes. You’re already surveilled in your workplace. You already have propaganda shaped for you. You’re already rigorously controlled, with severe consequences for disobedience. I don’t think the left can win a fight against fascism without asking questions about the basic structure of workplaces in whatever society it seeks to create.

It’s not that workers want fascism, or that they’re consciously aware of any of this. It’s just that this is already workers’ day-to-day lives. If the country becomes more authoritarian, but the majority of my waking life is already spent operating inside a totalitarian institution, then how much am I really going to notice the change, much less get animated about it?

Really, this is just reason number nine-hundred-and-seventy-two (or whatever) as to why I’m a pareconist as much for strategic reasons as I am for moral ones. Ultimately, I see parecon as indispensable to good strategy for any left. However, as I also am convinced that the left will never take up parecon in a million years for reasons I have discussed elsewhere,2 that means I really don’t think the long-term prospects for ever building a successful left in the United States are really that good.

I’d like to be wrong about this, but I have yet to see the first piece of evidence that I am. And I do think that, ultimately, the U.S. will morph into a hard fascist state — and no, I don’t think Trump will have anything to do with it. Whenever it arrives, it will be led by someone who is actually dangerous and sinister — not an incompetent boob like Trump.3

Why don’t the Democrats guarantee abortion rights?

Expectations.  They don’t refuse to do it so they can run on a message of, “Vote for us or the Republicans will do so much worse.”  They run on that message because if they codify Roe, then you’ll have expectations going forward.

A few months ago, the Senate unanimously passed a bill that would have ended the semi-yearly time change related to Daylight Savings.  Pelosi won’t let the House vote on it.  Why?  It would be popular and it would actually save the business community money, because moving the clocks ahead in March has costs in terms of absenteeism.

If Congress passed it, suddenly people would see the government making a positive difference in their lives, then people would have expectations.  What would the government do next for an encore?

You can’t let people have expectations.  If people do have expectations, they can’t be controlled.  So you have to keep people’s expectations at zero all the time.

That’s why the Democrats won’t codify Roe.  It doesn’t matter if they get wiped out in a few months.  The U.S. ruling class, for whom the Democrats (and the Republicans) both work, don’t want you to have any expectations.  The Republicans will take over, and in a few years the voters will get sick of them and vote the Democrats back in again.  As long as nothing fundamental changes, the ruling class is happy, and any politicians who lose their elections in the rulers’ service will be well taken care of.

But crucially, the population will never ever be allowed to have any expectations whatsoever.  That’s fundamental to the never-ending ruling-class project of keeping the rabble in line.

To fix this, I argue that the left should attack the roots of the capitalist system itself and ask one simple question:  In a good society, should everyone do their fair share of shit work?

However, no one likes my approach and it will probably never be popular in my lifetime, if ever.  So, in lieu of that, I think people should take Jimmy Dore’s advice and stop voting for Democrats and stop donating to Democrats.1

Yves Smith is a Democrat.

I mean, it’s obvious now, right?  And who else but a Democrat would call Jimmy Dore a troll?

I realize Jimmy Dore lives in a nice house, too.  But at least Jimmy isn’t running interference for the worst people in the country.

Jimmy constantly tells people to stop donating to Democrats or voting for them.1  But despite Yves’s and Lambert’s apparent criticism of the Democrats, you will notice they never ever tell you to stop donating to them, voting for them, or supporting them in any way.

They’re Democrats.  That’s the explanation that makes it all make sense.  I would love to see a list of who their biggest funders are.  I wonder how much money Ro gave Yves last year?

Robert, how much is Susan worth?

Of the Canadian truckers, Naked Capitalism‘s Lambert Strether writes

If we ask ourselves what sort of trucker is able to drive their rig to Ottawa, stay there for days, and even render their truck dysfunctional, the answer is clear: Owner operators… [I]f this were a labor dispute, it would be ludicrous to think that the Canadian truckers (these Canadian truckers could or should represent all truckers, just as it would be ludicruous [sic] for labor aristocrats to claim they represnted [sic] gig workers.

For Strether, apparently the truckers are not working-class enough — they are apparently just two steps removed from being capitalists like Jeff Bezos or something.

However, Strether’s boss, Naked Capitalism owner Yves Smith, lives in a half-a-million dollar (as of 2/13/22) home in a ritzy neighborhood of Birmingham, Alabama — where $500,000 probably goes farther than it does in, say, New York City.

If Strether is looking for someone’s bonafides to check, perhaps he can ask Smith.  I’m guessing she’s worth more than any of the truckers currently protesting in Canada.